Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration

By Phelim McAleer & Ann McElhinney

The outgoing leader of Greenpeace has admitted his organization’s recent claim that the Arctic Ice will disappear by 2030 was “a mistake.” Greenpeace made the claim in a July 15 press release entitled “Urgent Action Needed As Arctic Ice Melts,” which said there will be an ice-free Arctic by 2030 because of global warming. Under close questioning by BBC reporter Stephen Sackur on the “Hardtalk” program, Gerd Leipold, the retiring leader of Greenpeace, said the claim was wrong. “I don’t think it will be melting by 2030. … That may have been a mistake,” he said.

Sackur said the claim was inaccurate on two fronts, pointing out that the Arctic ice is a mass of 1.6 million square kilometers with a thickness of 3 km in the middle, and that it had survived much warmer periods in history than the present. The BBC reporter accused Leipold and Greenpeace of releasing “misleading information” and using “exaggeration and alarmism.” Leipold’s admission that Greenpeace issued misleading information is a major embarrassment to the organization, which often has been accused of alarmism but has always insisted that it applies full scientific rigor in its global-warming pronouncements. Although he admitted Greenpeace had released inaccurate but alarming information, Leipold defended the organization’s practice of “emotionalizing issues” in order to bring the public around to its way of thinking and alter public opinion. Leipold said later in the BBC interview that there is an urgent need for the suppression of economic growth in the United States and around the world. He said annual growth rates of 3 percent to 8 percent cannot continue without serious consequences for the climate. “We will definitely have to move to a different concept of growth. … The lifestyle of the rich in the world is not a sustainable model,” Leipold said. “If you take the lifestyle, its cost on the environment, and you multiply it with the billions of people and an increasing world population, you come up with numbers which are truly scary.” (Watch the full BBC interview with Leipold here.)

Source

The Kind Of Debate Al Gore Hates

By K. Daniel Glover
Unlike Al Gore, Ann and Phelim love a good debate about the excesses of environmentalism, and they proved it this week at the National Conservative Student Conference in Washington. Most of the crowd at the Young America’s Foundation event applauded the message of Not Evil Just Wrong, which exposes the lies about global warming and the DDT scare tactics that inspired today’s environmentalism. But there were a few skeptics who engaged Phelim and Ann in debate both during and after the event. One woman asked whether today’s technology could ensure that DDT does not hurt the environment if used to fight malaria. “There is no evidence that DDT has caused harm to anyone, anywhere, ever in the world,” Phelim said. “But it’s been a very good propaganda campaign.” Ann added that environmentalists aren’t above lying. “You’re safe enough,” she assured. The bluntest exchange occurred a when a man from the Young Britons’ Foundation, who said his father is a member of the British Green Party, made the case for protecting “green spaces” in London. “I would like us to grow up in a world that has green spaces and wildlife and all of the rest of it,” he said, asking Phelim and Ann their views on aviation expansion. Phelim reminded the audience that Gore “has an electricity bill 10 times the average American” and that stopping airport expansion in London also means stopping it in poor countries that need more of that kind of progress. “I really, really, really want to see the day when everybody in Africa and London has Al Gore’s electricity bill,” Phelim added. “It will mean the end of poverty. … And we’re not going to end poverty by stopping airports expanding.” Ann scoffed at the notion that the world is on the verge of losing all of its green spaces, a concept pushed on children in the 2008 animated movie WALL-E. And she praised the value of big cities like London, which contribute to the arts, education and medicine. After the speech, Ann chatted with several college students. One of them, also from Britain, insisted that mankind is to blame for “climate change.” He characterized himself as a moderate and distanced himself from both anti-pollution legislation and environmentalists who say there are too many people on the planet, but he said carbon dioxide emissions are a problem. Ann peppered the man with questions about why the earth was warmer before and whether the United States should impose regulations to address his concerns. Toward the end of the debate, the man noted that he hadn’t tried to escape. “Al Gore walks away,” Ann said in response. “What do you make of that?” “If I had studied the issue in depth and I was armed with facts and statistics [like Gore],” he said, “then I’d stay and argue.” The British student is definitely the exception to the rule. As Ann noted in her speech, environmentalists love to talk about “settled science” and shut down rhetorically whenever they are challenged about the havoc they have wreaked on poor children. After they “do their whole emotional thing about the lemurs,” she said, “they will eventually walk away because they have no answer to your question.”
Source

Ann, Phelim, and Ted's Most Excellent Adventure

By Phelim McAleer

I’m a part of the ecosystem. You’re a part of the ecosystem. WE are all a part of the ecosystem. If only Ted Turner understood that. Here’s Ann & Phelim on Beef vs. Bison and beasts, bisons, and, us, beings- while visiting Ted’s Montana Grill. For the record: we had some excellent BEEF burgers. Given the menu’s reasoning, we passed on the bison this time.

Visit NotEvilJustWrong.com