Incredibly, there are still pundits like Ann McFeatters promoting the human-caused, carbon dioxide-caused, global warming myth. They demand governmental action to limit human carbon dioxide emissions. Why? Some are just naive. Some are self-anointed environmentalists like Al Gore, taking financial or political positions that will keep them employed or fabulously wealthy if carbon dioxide emissions are politically controlled. Scientific conclusions are not determined by vague, political claims of scientific consensus, but by hard, reproducible facts. Saying most scientists agree that human-caused carbon dioxide emissions affect global temperatures is simply pre-empting honest analyses. Many scientists and hard data suggest the earth may actually be cooling, as was generally accepted just 30 years ago. There is no scientific evidence that human activity produces carbon dioxide emissions sufficient to affect global temperatures. Water vapor is by far the predominant greenhouse gas. Atmospheric water vapor concentration ranges up to 4 percent, lower at the poles. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration from all sources is only 0.038 percent. Human contribution to this clearly is insignificant in affecting global temperature. When a political, quasi-scientific organization like the Environmental Protection Agency promotes man-caused global warming, it’s responding to political pressure, not giving scientific analysis. Organizations, including NASA, have been caught replacing October data with September data to create the illusion of warming. Temperature measuring stations have been positioned near air-conditioner units to falsify data. Claims of scientific evidence are bogus unless supported by incontrovertible analysis. The term “global warming” is being replaced by “climate change.” Why? Because even politicians know data from the past decade suggests the earth is cooling. However, dishonest politicians and scientists have political and financial interest in promoting the myth. Let’s stop blindly accepting their propaganda as reality and look at facts. Feel free to think! Marvin P. Mathiak Knoxville
Author: admin
British ‘Lady’ whines Aussies are revolting on climate change
“Baroness Valerie Amos is only ‘surprised’ that Australians question climate change because ‘Her Ladyship’ would not be used to questioning from commoners back in feudal England,” Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood said today. The new British High Commissioner to Australia, Baroness Amos told The Age on 13th November, “I have been surprised that the science itself is being questioned [in Australia] … In the UK, there is a degree of political consensus…” Mr Isherwood responded, “Her Ladyship has weighed into the climate change debate in Australia, because the British, who fabricated the fraud of man-made global warming, know they are losing. “Their tactic to get away with the fraud was to cow people into not questioning it, by screaming ‘consensus’, but it hasn’t worked. “Now, in the countdown to Copenhagen, the British and their key assets, including Kevin Rudd, are lashing out at heretics, I mean sceptics, and resorting to an all-out fear campaign around wild claims of rising sea levels, Italy running out of pasta, and so on.” A leading world authority on sea levels, Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, past president (1999-2003) of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution, has slammed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports on sea levels, pointing out that he had been an expert reviewer for the IPCC in both 2000 and 2006 and when he read an IPCC report, “it had 22 authors, but none of them—none—were sea-level specialists.” In an interview with EIR magazine on 6th June 2007, Dr Mörner pointed out that from 1992 to 2002, satellite data indicated no sea level rise at all: the graph “was a straight line … no trend whatsoever.” Then in 2003, IPCC publications showed a 2.3 mm per year rising sea level trend, for the same data set! Mörner: “those people in the IPCC, choose Hong Kong, which has six tide gauges, and they choose the record of one, which gives 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level. Every geologist knows that that is a subsiding area. … That is terrible! As a matter of fact, it is a falsification of the data set.” Mr Isherwood pointed out that the intention of the British oligarchy’s climate change fraud was global population reduction, on a mass scale: “For over 200 years, since the days when the British East India Company paid Parson Thomas Malthus to write his Essay on the Principle of Population, the British oligarchy has demonised human population growth, and devised political campaigns around free trade, eugenics, and now environmentalism, to reverse the ‘threat’. “The good news is that it is the anti-population agenda which is bringing the climate change alarmists undone, because nations with the biggest populations like China and India are refusing fraudsters’ demands that they destroy their food production in order to cut carbon dioxide emissions, so the Copenhagen pow-wow is fast turning into a big non-event. “It is time to kill off this anti-human scam once and for all, and instead solve the real global crisis—the collapse of the economy—with industry and infrastructure, along the lines of the recent Russia-China agreement, so we can give humanity a future,” he concluded. Click here to read more about the fraud of global warming.
To receive a free literature pack revealing the fraud of man-made climate change, click here.
Click here to join the CEC as a member.
Click here to refer others to receive regular email updates from the Citizens Electoral Council of Australia.
Gore offers you a choice between life and death
About “Our Choice”
By Tom Nelson
On a page by itself, we find this inside the front cover of Al Gore’s latest climate fraud promotion book:
I’m offering you the choice of life or death. You can choose either blessings or curses.
–Deuteronomy Chapter 30, Verse 19
Let’s imagine that a Republican former vice president (say Dan Quayle or Dick Cheney) authored a similar book telling us that apocalypse was at hand unless we shoveled massive amounts of public money toward companies they’ve heavily invested in. Let’s say the Republican-authored book also prominently featured the Bible verse above, suggesting that Quayle or Cheney was offering the reader the choice between life of death.
In the scenario above, would the mainstream media give Quayle or Cheney with the same respect and free book promotion airtime that Gore has received in recent weeks?
Amazon.com: Our Choice: Review by Al Gore’s business partner John Doerr
My daughter said “Dad, your generation created this problem. You’d better fix it.” Our Choice is the Field Guide to fixing the climate crisis, a set of solutions worthy of your consideration.
Read this book. If you must, burn (and sequester) the others. And recycle the rest!
When mankind confronts and conquers the climate crisis it will be because one man made Our Choice clear.
2007: YouTube – John Doerr cries
At the end of the Kleiner Perkins partner’s presentation at TED, about the perils of climate change, he chokes up.
Update: Also see Gore’s alarmist book cover here.
Confoundingly, the climate isn't sticking to the script
Vancouver Sun
In describing the book Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming, by James Hoggan with Richard Littlemore, Stephen Hume disseminates the idea that a conspiracy of special interests has waged a PR campaign against scientific claims of anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming. My first reaction was, “He must be joking.” Never in history has a scientific subject received such favourable acceptance from the media. Indeed, AGW skeptics are regarded as crackpots and “deniers.”The problem with AGW is that the climate isn’t sticking to the script laid out by the models prepared by global-warming enthusiasts. The Earth is getting colder, not warmer.This is not data from some PR arm of the oil industry but from the four agencies that track global temperatures: the Hadley Climate Research Unit in Britain, the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City, the Christy Group at the University of Alabama and Remote Sensing Systems in California. All agree that the Earth’s temperature cooled in 2007 by 0.7 degrees C., the fastest drop on record. There has been no warming for the last nine years.To characterize legitimate scientists who don’t blindly accept global warming as gospel as perpetrators of a PR campaign does a grave disservice to honest debate.For more technical information on solar activity, check out the website http://wattsupwiththat.com. And, for great insight into how global cooling can be significantly more dangerous to humans than global warming, I recommend the book Cool It, by Bjorn Lomborg.Dick DraperWhistler
Not Evil Just Wrong on AFA — Who's Jamming What Down Your Throat
Dear Friends,
We have exciting news! Not Evil Just Wrong is going to be featured on the American Family Association’s Radio and TV network on Tuesday, November 17th.
The AFA chose Not Evil Just Wrong as this month’s featured topic and will be discussing aspects of the documentary on their radio and TV shows throughout the day.
This daylong special will be entitled Not Evil Just Wrong — Who’s Jamming What Down Your Throat. The shows will be available on all 200+ AFR stations and streamed on skyangel at afr.net and rightlyconcerned.com.
* At 7:35 am CST on the “Matt Friedeman” show.
* At 10:00 am CST on “Today’s Issues.”
* At 12:00 pm CST, we’ll be featured on the “AFA Report.”
* At 2:00 pm CST on the “Focal Point” show.
* At 4:00 pm CST on “Nothing But the Truth.”
We wrap up the day at 7:00 pm with a Not Evil Just Wrong Special with Crane Durham and Tim Wildmon. The show will be streamed on skyangel at afr.net, rightlyconcerned.com, afa.net, and ustream.tv.
We’re excited to reach such a large, national audience. We know many of you are just as concerned as we are about Global Warming alarmism. We’re looking forward to speaking with you, and to answering any questions you may have.
Check out the AFA website (afa.net) for further details.
-Phelim & Ann
Support us – and let the debate go on
By Jens Robdrup
The debate is not over as the Al Gore will have us to believe.
It’s the end of our western civilisation as we know it and enjoy it to day, if he gets his way. To cut carbon emissions as the warmists propose will bring us back to 1910!
Do You want to give up your present standard of living because of a dubious and flawed scientific theory?
The warmists want to govern your life: don’t eat meat, no australian wine, no air travel, no cars, only one minute in the shower, no oil or coal, but wind power even if you freeze, and anyone who oppose is a denier and should be procecuted for crimes against the climate. George Orwell and Aldous Huxley would be surprised. Its come true, what they warned against.
But we can stop this madness. Reason will prevail. But help us to bring it along.
We plan an advertising campaign in Danish and international newspapers, a poster campaign and issuing of leaflets during the IPPC conference in Cph 7.-21. December. Already we have arranged an alternative conference for the 8th of December.
But we need your support.
Any amount will be spent on this cause. Help us with £/$ 10,- or more and we fight for the same cause!
Go to www.climate-sense.com and learn more about us. It’s the only sceptical danish/English website. Or email us at: climate-sense@live.dk and ask for more information
Thank You for reading the above
Kindest regards
Jens Robdrup
Climate-sense@live.dk
PM to skip summit on climate change
OTTAWA–Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s jet-setting fall tour won’t include a stop at a global climate-change summit in Copenhagen next month. Harper is on a trip to Singapore for an APEC meeting, and India, and will visit China and South Korea in December. But he has turned down an invitation from the Danes to attend an environmental meeting and rebuffed UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon’s call for world leaders to help break the impasse in talks to cut global greenhouse gas emissions. [hahahaha]Read full story here.Finally, some real good news!
Barack Obama’s Suicide Mission to Copenhagen
By Tom Deweese
For more than fifteen years I have been studying and reporting on international United Nation conferences, treaties, and policies, warning that they are a road map to global governance and eventual UN global government. In addition, I have warned that the international environmental movement is not really concerned about protecting the environment at all – rather it is using mother earth as an excuse for an age-old drive for power and wealth. For those same fifteen years my warnings have fallen on deaf ears in Congress, in state houses and in city councils across the nation. Instead, I and others like me, have been labeled radical fringe and conspiracy nuts. As a consequence, I have been ignored by much of the media, dropped from major nation radio and television news shows that once invited me as a guest on a regular basis. Letters, petitions and meeting requests on Capitol Hill are ignored. Vindication comes in surprising ways sometimes. Case in point, on October 27, 2009, The Washington Times, DC’s “conservative” newspaper ran an editorial entitled: “Green World Government, the UN uses environmentalism to seize control.” Readers of The DeWeese Report, would not have found the Times revelation to be news. What is important is that after my warnings have been one of the lone voices in the wilderness, some in the media are beginning to see the threat – just as it is about to be jammed down their throats. The fact is, the warnings I’ve been sounding are now transformed into urgent alarm bells. The Times editorial was about the coming UN Copenhagen Climate Treaty and it contains just about every threat to our nation’s economy and sovereignty to vindicate my fifteen years of forced isolation. All the players and issues are here to enforce global control over our nation and our personal lives. The UN; World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace; global warming; Sustainable Development; and attempts by the UN to enforce global taxes. I have issued articles on every one of those. And there is the new player in the game – Barack Obama. He of course, is the reason why this new Treaty is causing such a stir and why even some main-stream media is beginning to pick up on the danger. Obama is just nuts enough to actually sign a document that would make our nation subservient to UN schemes of global control. In fact, that is exactly what he intends to do. And here are some of the details of what Obama would be signing – essentially committing the United States to comply. First, The Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty will enforce dire restrictions on all humankind. One provision called the “Facility” will be used to “reorder society” to change the structure of civilization, making the environment the ruling principle. The Facility is designed to bring together a massive number of “fragmented” environmental organizations and existing regulating structures, so they can all work together. In other words, any action taken by mankind will be regulated – because anything we do has some impact on the environment. Energy, of course, will be the prime target. The policy won’t be to find more – it will be to cut back on its use. Homes will not be warmed or cooled. Cars will not be driven. And manufacturing will be sharply curtailed – at least in the “developed” countries. The price of everything manufactured by using energy (EVERYTHING) from toothpaste to food will skyrocket. Shortages will abound. Most of all, however, the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty is a vicious global indictment of developed industrial nations. Its pretense is that Third World nations are suffering economically because of their carbon emissions, which have changed the environment, thereby causing them economic and social loss. To compensate these poor victims of unbridled capitalism, the Treaty calls for compensation from the big, bad developed nations (the United States), in the form of at least 0.7% of annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from each nation. That adds up to about $800 billion over five years, with additional funding requirements assessed on an “as needed” basis. However, the Treaty language is not yet complete and there is talk of making that figure as much as 2% of the GDP, which is roughly half of our nation’s total defense budget. To collect these taxes, the treaty will establish a new governing body called the Conference of the Parties (COP), which will be given ultimate authority over the administration and enforcement of the treaty provisions. For additional resources, COP will have the ability to tax aviation and shipping. But, in the small print, things get worse. It says COP’s taxing authority “is not limited to” the above. That means they can tax anything that moves. Again, what’s this money supposed to be used for? Oh yes, compensating those poor Third World nations. The UN calls it a “carbon debt” that the developed nations owe to the rest of the world. This is to be a punishment on the developed nations because they refused to abide by previous UN efforts, such as the Kyoto Climate Change Accord which called for reducing energy use by as much as 30%, and thus would destroy the economies of entire nations. Shame on us for not playing along. The actual language of the treaty says: “The adverse effects of climate change and response measures, due to the historical cumulative GHG emissions of developed countries, constitute an additional burden on all developing country Parties (particularly low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods, drought and desertification, and developing countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems) in reducing poverty, developing strategies to address social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable development and a threat to achieving the United Nations Millennium Goals.” There it is. We are to be punished for refusing to destroy ourselves. And why were we supposed to do that? Because of global warming. It doesn’t matter that scientists from around the world, including leading UN climate scientists now report that there is absolutely no evidence of man-made global warming. In fact, more and more scientists are reporting an actual cooling taking place. There is no nation drowning under rising oceans. There are no floods or hurricanes consuming nations. Droughts and desertification in most cases is natural. The only man-made desertification taking place in the world is being caused by bad government policy. The worse example of desertification is taking place in the middle of California in one of the previously most productive agriculture areas in the world. Today, because of environmental protection policy, farmers have had their water cut off to save a one inch long fish. Will treaty money be sent to those farmers to pay them back for such policies? Of course not. It doesn’t matter that science shows that CO2 is not a pollutant but a valuable natural substance necessary for the existence of life on earth. Above all it doesn’t matter that the largest emitters of CO2 are China, India, and Brazil, and they are all exempt from the treaty’s massive restrictions on emissions and energy use. How, then, does such a treaty pretend to have anything to do with helping the environment? In truth it doesn’t, and every party involved, from the environmental groups to Barack Obama, knows that this treaty is designed to do one thing- redistribute wealth away from the developed nations to nations that want to suck the life blood out of the United States. Nations like those in Africa are poor, not because of pollution, or lack of resources or even lack of education. They are poor for one reason—bad government. Those that refuse to allow their people to own property and build their own wealth and dreams. Oppressive governments that confiscate the results of the labor of their people. Governments like Robert Mugabe’s in Zimbabwe, who took the breadbasket of Africa and turned it into a desert. And those same governments intend to be first in line to gather their share of the booty from the treaty. Will their people be better off? No. Will the environment be better off? No. Will the United States be better off after Obama signs this monster? No. So who benefits? The United Nations finally gets its global government. The environmental groups finally get their power inside the elite. The totalitarian dictators of the poor, undeveloped nations get their Swiss bank accounts enlarged and all the trappings of wealth that go with it.
If Barack Obama signs the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty he will be committing national suicide
Will Barack Obama sign the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty? Insider reports indicate that there are two things that could keep him from making the trip. First, if the language isn’t finished by the December meeting deadline he says he won’t go. Second, if the U.S. Congress has not yet passed the Cap and Trade fiasco (the domestic version of the treaty) he says he won’t go. One thing is very clear. If Barack Obama signs the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty he will be committing national suicide. Americans must not ignore this threat. They must not sleep while Obama and his radicals drive us to destruction. Elected officials and the news media can no longer dismiss these threats as silly conspiracy theories. The time is now to let every elected representative in the Congress know that we will not tolerate Cap and Trade or the Climate Change Treaty. Allow either to become law of the land and stand back and watch the lights go out on the shining city on the hill.
Tom Deweese the publisher/editor of The DeWeese Report and is the President of the American Policy Center, a grassroots, activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, Virginia. Tom can be reached at: apc@governance.net
Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, Nov. 12th 2009
Al Gore wants to send President Obama to Copenhagen for Hopenchangen, Global Warming speaks English and supports the war on terror, and Aussie PM Kevin Rudd doubles down on stupid. Again. Jump in to the weekly round-up, admire the hottie and for bonus fun play the spot the not-a-climatologist.
Part One: Al Gore & Friends
The global warming Goreacle was all over the place promoting his new book, carbon footprint be damned:
Right now I am in San Francisco. On Wednesday, I’ll be in Phoenix speaking at Greenbuild Conference and later this week, I am looking forward to appearing at the Miami Book Fair. I hope to see some of you at these events.
President Narcissist Obama likes to surround himself with Marxists, Al likes to quote Marxists. What could possibly go wrong? Costco hosted Al on the front cover of their member mag, but is the pudgy green giant a good fit for the retail giant? The Gore Lied AIT Index is updated, and it’s still inconvenient for warmists everywhere. Glenn Beck and PETA agree and double-team Al Gore. Enjoy: .. Al Gore, ex-VP, activist and author (but not a climatologist) talks to the UK’s leftist Guardian and repeats his suggestion that civil disobedience has a role to play in promoting his global warming personal enrichment program climate crisis. Talking of profiting prophets, should he? Al blogged that he thought it would be a good idea for the President to go to the Copenhagen Hopenchangen Global Warming Hoe-Down. As I recall, Obama’s last trip to Copenhagen didn’t work out so well. Al’s all steamed up about all the recent talk about global cooling, which is harshing his global warming mellow. He pulls out the big guns to debunk cooling, citing the Associated Press and 4 (count ‘em!) statisticians. Money quote:
“”If you look at the data and sort of cherry-pick a micro-trend within a bigger trend, that technique is particularly suspect,” said John Grego, a professor of statistics at the University of South Carolina””.
Al’s science buddies don’t think cherry-picking data is such a bad idea, so why should he mind now? In Canada, totalitarian hippie and fruit-fly geneticist (but not a climatologist) David ‘jail ‘em‘ Suzuki is going to feature in a documentary about his life. For Suzuki fans who cannot wait for the cinematic experience, The Daily Bayonet recommends spending three hours watching your grass grow over the weekend, it’ll be a good substitute. And greener too. Meanwhile, fellow BC residents still aren’t buying what Suzuki’s selling.
Part Two: AGW Scaremongers
Good news, Darwinism for activists is alive and well. They’re into Day 6, anyone want to start a pool on when they cave? If you’re still uncertain if global warming is real or not, here’s 10 previous mega-scares that turned out to be nothing at all. Aussie PM Kevin Rudd thinks I’m dangerous. Well, OK, he thinks all skeptics are dangerous, I can’t take all the credit. Meanwhile, while Kev rails against the least gullible members of society, his government has failed to keep its promise to use clean energy. Awkward. To complete Rudd’s pratfall, the fabulously named Jo Nova takes Kevin to the woodshed for his attack on skeptics.CLICK HERE to read the rest over at The Daily Bayonet!